Editorial: ‘No’ on Question 1 — a risky bet on slots

Share on Facebook0Tweet about this on Twitter0Share on LinkedIn0Email this to someonePrint this page

Question 1 on the Massachusetts ballot asks voters to approve a second slots parlor in the state.

So narrowly construed is the bill — “adjacent to and within 1,500 feet of a race track”, “where a horse racing meeting may physically be held”, “where a horse racing meeting shall have been hosted” — that the only place where it could be sited is near Suffolk Downs in Revere.


The bill stands to benefit, or not, only Eugene McClain, the man behind it.

More Sun election coverage:

Please log in or subscribe to continue reading. Weekly access is only $2. No recurring charges.